“Community” in the English-Speaking World
The concept and its uses in social and political discourse
International conference Université Bordeaux-Montaigne
Laboratoires CLIMAS (UBM) and CREA (Paris Ouest – Nanterre La Défense)
September 26-27, 2019
(illustration: Simon Roberts: Keynes Country Park
Beach, Shornecote, Gloucestershire, 11th May 2008)
The term “community” is widely used in the English language, in everyday conversation, in the vocabulary of social workers and political leaders, in the analyses of social scientists. The term is encountered in many different fields of research, though one is right to wonder if it refers to the same object.
“Community” is often used and invoked to the point of being naturalized as unquestioned common sense, and its usage and implications are seldom consciously examined or interrogated. It elicits positive, reassuring associations with what is familiar, close, recognizable. “Community”, as Raymond Williams underlines, is both "the warmly persuasive word to describe an existing set of relationships; or the warmly persuasive word to describe an alternative set of relationships” (“Community”, Keywords, A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana, 1983, p.75.)
Community is used by scholars, as a conceptual tool defining a social group interacting on the basis of shared interests, values, representations, language, cultural practices, with or without being bound to a specific geographic space; it is also used in an empirical manner as a descriptive tool which seems to conjure up an ideal level of social organisation characterized by closeness.
It seems to articulate the levels of local and global, especially with the rise of the internet which has strengthened the possibility for new “imagined communities” to flourish, beyond the national community whose symbolic representations were examined by Benedict Anderson.
What makes “community” such a successful and enduring concept? Is it always satisfactory and pertinent, or can it be an easy and fashionable word which may be reductive, generalizing, and even manipulative? The conference seeks precisely to interrogate the uses made of the term in political discourse, in the social sciences, in the terminology of organisations. The conference will explore the historical and contemporary uses of the term, from the utopian socialist communities imagined by Owen to uses of the term today, in relation with minorities or with online social networks. It aims at charting the course of a concept which seems to be equally present both in progressive and conservative political discourses.
Preference will be given to papers whose argument is centred on the uses of community in artistic, religious, social, political or academic discourse in the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, and the United States or their transnational circulations to or from those spaces. Themes which papers could address include, but are not limited to, the following:
· Constructing the ideal community: community in utopian socialism (Owen, Morris, Edward Carpenter, Ebenezer Howard…); in the Labour movement; in counter-culture.
· Appropriation of the term in political discourse; ideological investment of the term in the rhetoric of different political parties.
· Community activism: local forms of political action encouraging grassroots practices.
· Community arts in the late 1960s and 1970s.
· Minorities and communities: use of the term in relation to ethnic, gender and sexual minorities, to refer to indigenous populations. Self-designating communities or imposed generalizing categories?
· Community and boundaries; community and the notion of symbolic frontiers; community and the construction of the Other.
· Community vs “society”: what is at stake when one term is preferred to the other?
· Virtual communities – online social networks
· Community Studies: community as an object of academic discourse
Anderson, Benedict, 1983. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London, New York: Verso.
Brubaker, Rogers, and Frederick Cooper. 2000. “Beyond ‘Identity.’” Theory and Society 29 (1): 1–47.
Buckler, Steve, 2007. “Theory, Ideology, Rhetoric: Ideas in Politics and the Case of “Community” in Recent Political Discourse”, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 9, p. 36-54.
Connell, Raewyn. 2016. “Masculinities in Global Perspective: Hegemony, Contestation, and Changing Structures of Power.” Theory and Society 45 (4): 303–318.
Freeman, John H., and Pino G. Audia. 2006. “Community Ecology and the Sociology of Organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology 32 (1): 145–69.
Lamont, Michèle, and Virág Molnár. 2002. “The Study Of Boundaries In The Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 167–195.
Little, Adrian, 2002. The Politics of Community: Theory and Practice. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
Nagel, Joane. 2000. “Ethnicity and Sexuality.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 107–33.
Schrecker, Cherry, 2006. La communauté : histoire critique d'un concept dans la sociologie anglo-saxonne, Paris: L'Harmattan.
Proposals for papers of c.200 words should be sent, together with a short biographical note, to Mathilde Bertrand (mathilde.bertrand@u- bordeaux-montaigne.fr), Trevor Harris (